The façade of the future was already there

16.10.2024
Smart façade design is underestimated as a climate solution, argues colleague Martijn Vyncke in an opinion piece he wrote for NAV.
Kortrijk project 025r 3947

The building envelope as the answer to comfort

Mechanical air cooling originated in 1902. Afterwards, the thermostat and fixed set point tailored to the ‘standard comfort level’ also became more established. This process was further accelerated after the integration of air conditioning in cars, buses and trains. Air conditioning has become so accessible that everyone has become accustomed to it.

Meanwhile, companies continue to search for new technologies to meet our ever-increasing comfort expectations. But blind reliance on technology creates energy scarcity in a world where mobility, AI, clouds and blockchain are also competing for green power.

By contrast, building styles of the past show tried-and-tested alternatives that provided comfort in the face of tighter energy supply. Building methodologies from other climate zones with similar supply of resources and solar settings can also inspire low-tech solutions.

Buildings that are autarkic, holistic and low-tech thanks to intelligent façade design can greatly reduce our energy footprint and dependence on electricity or fossil fuel.

Backed by historical experimentation, we can break through contemporary sameness while bypassing past mistakes. I like to illustrate this with two examples.
IMG20210414141505

Case 1: Hofkamer, Antwerp (1772)

During our renovation assignments or expertises in various buildings, it has been noticed that solutions to comfort issues that originated in pre-electra times are easier to maintain in times when excess cannot be sustained. We were asked in 2021 to come up with a solution to a solar radiation problem while respecting heritage. The site and its surroundings were fully mapped and imported from the digital twin of Antwerp which is freely available. After double-checking some crucial dimensions, we went on to work.

3 D schaduwen omgeving

An analysis via a 3D model and botanical information showed that the hornbeam already present did not come into leaf early enough to counteract the problem of light penetration on the murals in the room. Additional trees, in turn, were not a good idea and highly image-defining.

IMG 7723

Solar control glazing or film was not compatible with the existing joinery and interior. These are also permanent measures that are not needed beyond the duration of the problem.

The answer was found in remnants of metal fixing points in the natural stone window frame and a French handbook on joinery published by the Académie Royal des Sciences (volume 1 - 1769).

Exterior blinds as a plug-in, hidden behind a wooden or metal lambrequin, have been an option since 1769. As a proof of concept, this can count.

255 years since the publication of the manual, the necessary updates and technological evolutions have been made, such as new materials for the louvres, UV-resistant cables, direct-current tube motors, Teflon-lubricated ball bearings or automation linked to adaptive thermostats. The basis remains that a façade element, whether or not linked to a system, is the first protection against annoying solar radiation. Manual systems require more user awareness. Automatic systems, in part, unburden occupants with energy as the pass currency.

Sun protection in the form of roller shutters, screens and curtains as thermal buffers are elements that have been present in our buildings for a long time and are subject to trends, style choices and tastes, but remain as a principle. And make no mistake: fixed ornaments, lintels and window frames are also subject to stylistic whims, but essentially play a functional role in drainage, light refraction and creating façade depth.

IMG20210414144712

Since the rise of modernism, simplicity in architecture has been sought as a counter-movement against the excess of pure ornamentation. Think ‘building without eyebrows’ by Adolf Loos.

Form follows function, dixit Louis Sullivan. But not every ornament was a purely aesthetic choice. Finding out the functional purpose of historical elements and developing an appropriate and intelligent contemporary working through of them creates a design with historical individuality, more than a copy of the past.

Read the shading study
In the built heritage, you can see a wealth of experimentation that may count as proof of concept.
Martijn Vyncke
Kortrijk project 061 3950

Case 2: Passionistenlaan, Kortrijk (2014 – 2020)

When renovating the VAC Passionistenlaan in Kortrijk, Office KGDVS wanted to rid the existing concrete structure of all technical ducts and move them to the facade. This created a free floor plan. Via concrete discs in the form of balconies, a solution was found for overheating.

Kortrijk project 019r 3948

But despite the large canopies and deep daylights, how do you bring in enough daylight? For this, we looked at a 1938 project by Baas and Stockla. They integrated glass valleys into a concrete canopy to screen off a balcony while still making it translucent. The integration of glass in concrete was seen as a means of creating healthy indoor environments and saving on gas and electricity.

We eventually arrived at a result with round cut-outs in the concrete slab, filled in with walkable glass. This is both light and walkable.

A new current will emerge if we seek the solution for climate and comfort in the building envelope as well as in lessons from the past. We must then translate these into a contemporary image.

B B Martijn Vyncke 8087 Large

Do you have a question for Martin?

Or would you like to tell him your thoughts? Do not hesitate.